You are currently watching my old blog - the new is located at: blog.theundersigned.net

The undersigned

Blog accessibility

I’m thinking about my blog’s accessibility, how to browse around it - it’s far from good enough I think. Its not the huge header in it self, it is the way posts are hidden.

I think that it’s good, blogging has opened up doors for many people to share their thought on different topics. But take a look at my site here - 190 posts, hidden in 6 categories. The bottom navigation makes it possible to jump to each category, the 10 most commented posts, the 10 latest posts, and search. But even with those navigation options, people would really have to know what they are looking for, in order to find it.

This accessibility issue is far from new, and every blogging tool is giving their best shot at optimizing it - bringing everything to the »top level« of the site. Sidebars filled with links to categories, tags, archives, a calendar, a search function - everything. A huge step, I think, is the slowly change from categories to tags - the possibility of not being »forced« to pick a category from a given list, when you write a post, but the freedom to write any words you think match your posts content.

I don’t write this, because I know a better way to do it, but I surely would love to get some ideas.

Many blogs use a simple site structure. On the front page, 5-10 latest posts is listed in full length or an excerpt - so is the category/tag pages, archive pages, search result pages etc. From all the different pages it is always possible to jump to any view from an extra navigation (sidebar, bottom navigation etc.). My question is, is it the title or the content that makes people click a post to »read more« - if posts are listed in full length, what is the idea of a single post view besides the possibility to comment?

I think a way to do the first optimizing could be to only show one post in full length on the front page, and let the rest be only titles or small excerpts. That way maybe 20 posts can be shown instead of 10, and take up the same space. The same goes for category/tag pages, archive pages etc, why show the posts in their full lenght? Excerpts lets you show much more.

The next idea is a digg-alike system. Posts are mostly shown, ordered by date - would it be a better idea to order them by popularity? A way to do it, is like I have done in the bottom navigation - show the 10 most commented posts, but thats far from good. We need a more »intelligent« system, a way to combine the most read, most commented, latest commented and most linked(?) posts with their dates, in order to bring the best content to the top level of the site.

In addition to the digg-alike system, maybe it is time for us bloggers to use a landing-site system. Landing sites are well known from the eCommerce world - ever experience you searched google for »cheap colgate toothpaste« and found an online reseller, and the site you landed on from google was exactly about colgate toothpaste? What if we grabbed the google search string from the visitor, and made the front page listing a mix of related posts to what he searched for and the newest posts? It would definitely create a higher click-through-rate on your adsense ads, because they suddenly show »ads related to your posts related to the visitors search string«. It would also increase your pageviews per visitor count, because the content that is looked for is suddenly on the top level of your blog.

Tags or categories? I am still using categories, but when I redesign again, I think I will make the switch to tags. I have tested out tags on a couple of other sites (example), and its given good results - pageviews per visitor increased from ~5 to ~7. I find that tags is the best way to let people browse a blog, finding related posts. In addition to the way I run it at webdesignbook.net, I might want to create a »related tags« list, when people browse the site using tags. Giving your visitors more and more choices of navigation, when they digg deeper into your blog, makes it harder for them to leave the site, and even though many posts share the same tags, the site will feel bigger. By using a tag system it is also easily possible to list 5-10 related posts, at the end of a post. Just list the 10 newest that shares the most tags.

Summary

Ideas to increase pageviews per visitor and »reveal the hidden blog content«:

  • Cut down on full length listing of posts and mix with excerpts.
  • A digg-alike system, bringing the most popular content to the front.
  • Landing sites to bring relevant posts to the top level.
  • More navigation options deeper in the blog in addition to the sidebar/bottom navigation:
    • Tags
    • Related tags list
    • Related posts list

Do you have any experience in optimizing websites or blogs in this matter? Other ideas to ensure that the visitors find the things they are looking for?

19 comments

Don Says:

If there was a golden rule on better blog accessibility, they should have printed it ages ago. But as much as style is concerned, accessibility seems to be just a small factor in the design of most sites.

I do agree with you on the points you presented. Accessibility is all about presenting the content in either a chronological fashion or by weight of importance.

Regular bloggers like me highlight the latest and give a preview of the rest of the older posts. Some others find a way of presenting feature articles by using cute little boxes that catch readers attention. There’s also the popularity of small notes that we now know as “asides”.

Design-wise, I don’t believe that the reader should be presented with an overwhelming sea of information at first glance (unless I’m looking at search results). If I see a site’s front page and I see clutter, chances are, I’d close the browser or look for some other site that will give me a clearer view. But that’s just me. I hate clutter. Even then, most designers should think about bringing focus on what’s important.

It is nice to see front pages that present the latest post, excerpts, a featured article box, and maybe an ‘asides’ box. How to prevent clutter by bringing up the rest like 10 most recents (posts, comments, etc.) is another issue that can be answered primarily by creativity/artistry. I’ve hidden some of the ‘clutter’ inside a vault that any reader can access by a single click.

You have a lot of great articles on your site. If you’re doing a re-design, I hope you can provide a nifty column that will present your articles’ titles and concise abstracts. Abstracts will be great on your site and I’d love to see them soon. :)

19/05-2006 | 16:02


The undersigned Says:

Well, lets think back in time - blog->weblog->a log on the internet = blogs were originally intented to be chronology.

I think the »golden rule on better blog accessibility« is non-existant, everything can be approved. Blogs has developed from being a log to being used for several purposes, ex. a publishing framework, to share articles, tutorials and guides.

I agree that the user shouldn’t »be presented with an overwhelming sea of information at first glance«, but its also about the way it is presented. Like I mentioned in the post, I think that giving more navigation options when you digg deeper on a site would be a way to do it.

And thanks, I am happy to hear someone likes my writing - the articles I’ve begun to write is also partly the reason is started thinking closer about the accessibility on my blog, and why I wrote this post. I want people to find what matches their interests, when they enter my site :)

19/05-2006 | 23:18


craig bellamy Says:

heya mate,

thanks very much for your free themes. I have a plan to turn one into ‘tag art’. i’ll keep you informed,

craig

20/05-2006 | 10:53


The undersigned Says:

Craig: You’re welcome :)

20/05-2006 | 23:28


Galeenet Says:

Text

End

21/05-2006 | 14:11


The undersigned » Blog Archive » 9rules submission Says:

[…] As I mentioned in the Blog accessibility post, I am not satisfied with the way content gets hidden on my blog - so I am working on a new design. […]

21/05-2006 | 14:35


The undersigned » Blog Archive » Redesign launched Says:

[…] As I’ve mentioned a couple of times before (ex. here), I have been working on a redesign for some time. […]

31/05-2006 | 19:58


Wordpress: Creating landing sites | The undersigned Says:

[…] I have been thinking about using landing sites in blogs (here): Landing sites are well known from the eCommerce world - ever experience you searched google for »cheap colgate toothpaste« and found an online reseller, and the site you landed on from google was exactly about colgate toothpaste? What if we grabbed the google search string from the visitor, and made the front page listing a mix of related posts to what he searched for and the newest posts? […]

04/06-2006 | 15:38


dockblog // hamburg » Blog Archive » Blog Landing Site - So finden Besucher schneller relevante Informationen Says:

[…] Nicht getestet, scheint aber ‘ne feine Sache zu sein. Einleitung zum Thema findet man hier. […]

05/06-2006 | 16:39


Aaron Says:

just stick to some W3C standard and it will be accessible

28/06-2006 | 19:19


The undersigned Says:

Aaron, seriously think it’s that simple? And please be specific on some of the W3C standards :)

28/06-2006 | 19:28


Aaron Says:

I think http://www.w3.org/WAI/ will do most of the good work for the rest check http://fae.cita.uiuc.edu/ to test the accessibility (nice tool)

28/06-2006 | 19:44


The undersigned Says:

Aaron> thanks for the links - i couldnt agree more, a good place to start. But unfortunately, imho, website accessibility stretches further than that - specific areas mentioned in my posts wont get covered by valid and semantic markup :)

28/06-2006 | 21:14


RaymonWazerri Says:

Hey,
I love what you’e doing!
Don’t ever change and best of luck.

Raymon W.

21/04-2007 | 0:35


URL Says:

dhfdh dhdh dhd dh d

24/04-2007 | 19:51


Leon Says:

excellent themes, thank you very much.

24/04-2007 | 19:56


RandyJones Says:

Looks Like Dallas is in trouble!
Phoenix might end up blowing them all away.

PHX vs. Det. Hmmm..Could be interesting?

25/04-2007 | 18:52


MaryAnne Says:

I’m not quite understanding what all
this is supposed to be about?
Must be me or something…

26/04-2007 | 18:27


Cat Says:

I think, the accessibility is good enought.
Many other blogs has big php-routines, which are far from “good enought”

Greetz
Cat

24/07-2007 | 12:57

Leave a Reply